A user left Bluehost for SiteGround, which had excellent speed and support but a high year-3 price, so they moved to Hostinger, which has been fine.
69signal
172reviewsi
A score out of 100. Negative and mixed reviews take points off, and so does having only a few reviews, so a handful of glowing reviews can’t beat a product many people like.
37% Positive22% Mixed41% Negative
Customers often praise fast sites and knowledgeable support, but the most common complaint is renewal prices that jump sharply after the intro period.
What customers love, and what they don’tWhat customers noticed
Liked
Watch for
Also mentioned: best for beginners1
Customer reviews (172)
Add your reviewShowing 15 reviews mentioning fast Show all
SiteGround is more expensive but noticeably faster, with SSD servers and zero downtime in 5 years.
Finds SiteGround cheap, fast, good value with excellent support, with no limitations apart from one image optimizer issue.
Nine-plus years on SiteGround; prefers the control and sites load insanely fast on GCP servers without a caching plugin.
Ten years on SiteGround with near-instant support and sub-1-second page loads at peak on shared hosting.
Loves SiteGround's easy backend and incredibly fast sites, but inode limits are hit on 8 simple WordPress sites.
Moved from HostGator to SiteGround and is very happy: very fast and easy to use.
Tried SiteGround, Hostinger, Bluehost and Cloudways and rates SiteGround best with good speed and reliability.
SiteGround is way better than Bluehost in features and performance, but support was their one bad experience.
A SiteGround customer of years finds it fast, with no downtime, free email and competent support, but pricey after the initial signup.
Moved from Bluehost to SiteGround and found the site noticeably faster, with a migration tool that worked seamlessly.
They moved from GoDaddy to SiteGround years ago and describe fast hosting, excellent customer service and good pricing.
An agency with ~30 sites says SiteGround's service is phenomenal with top-notch support, though it lacks an API and staging organization.
They have used SiteGround for a year and tested a clone of their heavy site elsewhere, including ScalaHosting. Nothing they tried was as fast as SiteGround.
A site went from an F to an A on GTmetrix just by migrating to SiteGround.
Common questions about SiteGround
What do customers say about SiteGround?
Customers often praise fast sites and knowledgeable support, but the most common complaint is renewal prices that jump sharply after the intro period. Some long-time customers say support has declined, with AI chat replacing humans, and a few hit inode or CPU limits.
Is SiteGround worth it?
Of the 106 reviews with a clear verdict, 37% are positive, 22% mixed and 42% negative. The praise mentioned most is helpful support. The most common complaint is renewal price hike.
What do people like about SiteGround?
The praise reviewers mention most: helpful support (25 reviews), reliable (12 reviews) and easy to use (10 reviews). For example: SiteGround's support is a well-informed human with clear English who often solves problems before you finish.
What are the most common complaints about SiteGround?
The complaints reviewers mention most: renewal price hike (29 reviews), poor support (21 reviews) and expensive (6 reviews). For example: Stayed years with SiteGround, then moved simple sites away over price hikes and more aggressive rate limiting.
What does the signal score of 69 mean?
It's how well reviewed SiteGround is, out of 100. Negative and mixed reviews take points off, and so does having only a few reviews: a service needs plenty of them, compared with the most-reviewed services here, to reach the high 80s and 90s. It's worked out from reviews only, needs at least 5 of them, and updates as new ones come in.
What are the specs of SiteGround?
Category: Shared hosting.
Where do these SiteGround reviews come from?
172 are quotes from Reddit, each linked to the original. Customer reviews are checked for spam before they appear. Every review, written here or quoted, is read as positive, mixed or negative.