After rebuilding a site on a custom stack, realises how much behind-the-scenes work Webflow handled for a front-end designer.
67signal
276reviewsi
A score out of 100. Negative and mixed reviews take points off, and so does having only a few reviews, so a handful of glowing reviews can’t beat a product many people like.
25% Positive23% Mixed52% Negative
What customers love, and what they don’tWhat customers noticed
Customer reviews (276)
Add your reviewShowing 28 reviews mentioning easy to use Show all
Marketer values Webflow because non-technical teams can run the site without hosting work or a developer.
After fixing many weaker builders, says Webflow is the best for non-developers and needs very little coding.
Non-professional found Wix junk and Framer disliked, and praises Webflow and its funny, effective tutorial videos.
They have done more and more Webflow projects over the last couple of years and enjoy it. They like the interface and the peace of mind about hosting and uptime.
Webflow is fast for basic marketing sites without hosting worries, but frustrating for anything more complex than a basic CMS.
Front-end developer of 20+ years thinks the Box element cleans up the Add panel and is a big improvement.
Moved to Astro with Directus but finds client self-management less collaborative than Webflow.
Built their site via Claude into Webflow with the MCP and sees no reason to leave given how easy landing pages are.
Non-technical founder finds Webflow glitchy but says managing it via Codex is super easy.
They find Webflow more intuitive and more mature with fewer bugs than Framer, which they found to have laggy animations. They say changes take less time and money than on WordPress.
Used Webflow mainly because its CMS and visual editor let clients make micro changes and maintain sites themselves.
Sees Webflow's CMS as a major strength for non-technical marketing teams compared with most other platforms.
Front-end coder likes Webflow for being Figma-like and flexible, though navigation and interactions are confusing.
Finds client management in Webflow a breeze, with clients logging into the editor and loving how easy it is.
Favours Webflow for making the developer experience visual and finds its CMS easy for clients' occasional updates.
They build in Webflow daily for hours and enjoy the interface so much that they will not switch to Framer or WordPress.
Non-developer designer loves Webflow and builds from Figma links via Claude in minutes.
Agency says non-technical clients still love Webflow and their pipeline on it keeps growing.
Solo marketer says Webflow is self-serve for them while engineers focus on the product.
Says their clients love Webflow more than any other CMS they have used.
Finds Webflow easier to use, with many templates and the ability to hand pages to developers with custom hosting.
Tried Webflow and found it a much better experience than WordPress, with a manageable learning curve.
Moved from hand-coded sites to exclusively Webflow because it is faster, more reliable and clients can edit themselves.
Chose Webflow for a client project because it was faster and easier than coding by hand.
Left WordPress for Webflow as a balance that avoids high maintenance cost and tinkering.
Webflow's learning curve brought them to tears but persistence paid off and it can become fun.
Builds simple client landing pages and settled on Webflow after trying other drag-and-drop builders.
Common questions about Webflow
Is Webflow worth it?
Of the 212 reviews with a clear verdict, 25% are positive, 23% mixed and 52% negative. The praise mentioned most is easy to use. The most common complaint is renewal price hike.
What do people like about Webflow?
The praise reviewers mention most: easy to use (21 reviews), great value (8 reviews) and reliable (5 reviews). For example: Sees Webflow's CMS as a major strength for non-technical marketing teams compared with most other platforms.
What are the most common complaints about Webflow?
The complaints reviewers mention most: renewal price hike (53 reviews), outages (15 reviews) and slow (9 reviews). For example: Frustrated that basic CMS features need community scripts despite Webflow's price and past CMS price increase.
What does the signal score of 67 mean?
It's how well reviewed Webflow is, out of 100. Negative and mixed reviews take points off, and so does having only a few reviews: a service needs plenty of them, compared with the most-reviewed services here, to reach the high 80s and 90s. It's worked out from reviews only, needs at least 5 of them, and updates as new ones come in.
What are the specs of Webflow?
Category: Website builder. Free plan: Yes.
Where do these Webflow reviews come from?
276 are quotes from Reddit, each linked to the original. Customer reviews are checked for spam before they appear. Every review, written here or quoted, is read as positive, mixed or negative.