Vercel Reviews

As a solo developer finds Vercel CI/CD, GitHub integration, cron support and rollback a lifesaver compared with maintaining production infrastructure.

Ran a web app on Vercel and liked the easy GitHub deploys and dashboard, but worried about the bill when junk traffic hit usage-based pricing, and later moved to a rented VPS.

Pays 20 a month for Vercel for personal and a wife’s coaching site and says it has been great.

Has never had any issues with Vercel despite hearing complaints, finding it easy in and out for simple projects.

Had a site on Vercel for a week and found great developer experience but bad invoices.

Stays on Vercel because moving off cost far more time in config and builds, though a small project once had higher usage than expected.

At a company with few people managing servers, Vercel is a one-time setup plus git push and just works, with labour cost far lower than AWS apart from one big outage.

Pays over 300 dollars a month on Vercel for what would cost about 80 on AWS directly; likes the developer experience but finds the markup insane and pricing opaque.

Says the Vercel free plan already offers speed insights, analytics and DDoS protection and works wonderfully with GitHub.

Small team chose Vercel and Next.js for very little setup and considers it the right professional choice despite disliking Vercel influence.

Prefers Vercel over GitHub Pages because apex and www domains with SSL just work, and likes the easy-to-configure Vercel Analytics.

Loves that Vercel just works out of the box with automatic deploys and a built-in CDN, but costs crept up once when image optimization, caching and serverless functions were not managed carefully.

Finds Vercel a great developer experience but is annoyed by inevitable serverless cold starts and ridiculously expensive analytics and add-ons.

A startup pays about 35 dollars a month plus occasional overages for Vercel, never thinks about frontend infrastructure, and says it never goes down while serving up to 1,000 visitors a day.

Usually deploys on Vercel because the CI/CD pipeline and built-in security are really nice with great developer experience.

Their Next.js site has been painless on Vercel, usually just a git push, and the convenience keeps them there.

Runs many small low-traffic projects on Vercel, which is cheap for that and simplifies deployment, moving projects out only if traffic grows a lot.

Uses Vercel because it is easy and friendly for ship-and-test projects, keeping a private VPS for more demanding validated projects.

Has used nothing but Vercel since discovering it, for both Next.js and SvelteKit.

Says Vercel is great and works well with their Next.js setup via GitHub Actions.

Deploys several very large projects on Vercel without spending a fortune, paying only for a Pro account to remove the watermark, and calls it the best of the best after trying alternatives.

Calls Vercel the best because analytics, caching and observability just work and save hours, so paying an extra 50 dollars a month is fine.

Loves Vercel as super easy to set up and maintain, with one catch: the Pro plan opts you into expensive Turbo build machines that you should switch to standard.

Pays 20 dollars a month to Vercel, merges to main and the site deploys, expecting the business model to cover bills as it scales.

Likes Vercel for its generous free tier, easy initial deployment and extras like basic observability and DDoS protection; says it is not meant to scale cheaply.

Finds Vercel at 20 dollars a month very reasonable for maintenance-free scaling, one-click deployment and git integration for most projects.

Uses Vercel hobby for dozens of projects, has never hit limits or been banned, and finds them friendly to free users.

Says Vercel works great in their experience, is easy and cheap and has a ton of features.

Uses Vercel for a large production front end with no issues and for proofs of concept, with free tier, custom domain and GitHub auto-deploy all easy.

Happy with Vercel for now because it lets them host React sites easily and for free.

After trying many approaches, Vercel remains the platform that gives the most comfort: easy to deploy, friendly interface, CDN support and basic analytics, simpler than Cloudflare Pages.

Sticks with Vercel managed infrastructure instead of paying a senior DevOps engineer, running a 10-person startup and even looking forward to a larger enterprise deal.

Moved from Cloudflare Workers to Vercel and found deployment ten times easier and bug free after constant errors connecting with Workers.

Finds Vercel’s mandatory phone verification when creating accounts the most annoying part and sometimes uses Cloudflare Pages instead.

Calls Vercel one of the best software products they have come across.

Uses Vercel for an MVP because of automatic preview and production deployments on commit and PR with live URLs, easy environment variable management, and helpful docs.

Says that whatever else is wrong with Vercel, difficulty is not one of them: deploying a Next.js site there is trivially easy.

Vercel has done a decent job hosting their low-traffic portfolio site.

Loves Vercel deploys and starts everything there, moving bigger projects to Coolify later.

Uses Vercel for personal projects and finds it far more straightforward to set up than their AWS SST deployment, without hitting prohibitive costs.