Cloudflare Pages Reviews

Static & frontend hosting

104 reviews
Cloudflare Pages
79signal
i

A score out of 100. Negative and mixed reviews take points off, and so does having only a few reviews, so a handful of glowing reviews can’t beat a product many people like.

104reviews

Generous free tier and fast static hosting, but server-side frameworks sent some back to Vercel.

Read reviewsVisit site

What customers love, and what they don’tWhat customers noticed

Also mentioned: best for developers1

Customer reviews (104)

Add your review

Showing 40 reviews mentioning good free plan Show all

Moved from Netlify to Cloudflare Pages for 500 free builds and no server compute, but found concurrent builds need a $20 Pro tier and support did not help.

Dropped a $180 renewal host for free Cloudflare Pages for a portfolio site and was glad to be rid of cPanel and DNS hassle, noting it is unbelievably fast.

Runs a professional portfolio built with Astro for free on Cloudflare with a proper domain and stupid fast performance; calls Cloudflare very cheap and powerful below enterprise level.

Chose Cloudflare Pages after trying multiple services because the free plan is generous, while Netlify got limiting with limited monthly deployments.

Has deployed numerous Next.js apps on Cloudflare Pages on the free tier without running out of usage; compatibility has improved a lot.

Moved a Kickstarter landing page from Lightsail WordPress to Cloudflare Pages with Supabase and is very satisfied with the setup.

Replaced a $320 a year WHM/cPanel setup with a static site on Cloudflare, took about two days to learn, and now pays only for domains.

Moved a popular static site pushing about 6 TB of bandwidth a month from Vercel to Cloudflare Pages and after a couple of weeks the bill is still free.

Switched to Cloudflare Pages with Eleventy after GitHub Pages needed a public repo, and it still works great and is free.

Built a GitHub plus Cloudflare Pages workflow that is straightforward and publishes a site in under 5 minutes at no extra cost per site.

Finds the Cloudflare Pages free tier very generous with no commercial restriction, and uses it with Workers for everything now.

Hosts a blog, portfolio, photo gallery and a couple of live side products with real users on Cloudflare Pages for a total bill of $0.

After five years paying Webflow fees they exported their one-page portfolio and now host it free on Cloudflare Pages.

Hosts a one-file game on the Cloudflare Pages free tier with a Worker plus KV leaderboard that has served players in 25 countries.

They autodeploy their projects from GitHub to Cloudflare Pages and like the extra features included for free.

Moved from Netlify to Cloudflare Pages and finds it better with better free limits, more stable infra and a better UI.

First time using Cloudflare, found deploying a React/Vite fan app to Pages super easy, with only a ~$10 domain as cost.

Has published SvelteKit apps to Cloudflare Pages for years for free without issue: pushes auto deploy and are live within seconds with no config.

A developer prefers Cloudflare Pages over Vercel: easy to set and forget, a generous free tier, and sites running for years with no issues.

They moved their static sites to Cloudflare Pages after a paid host lapsed, using the free tier with a custom domain and no card required.

Uses Cloudflare Pages for around 5 websites, three of them portfolios, and adds Workers when functions are needed.

Their business hosts four sites on Cloudflare Pages completely free with automatic preview deployments like Vercel, and received 250,000 dollars in Cloudflare credits.

Hosts a 53,000-file hiking guide on Cloudflare Pages free by splitting into two sites because of the 20,000-file limit, which hurt Google indexing.

Says Cloudflare Pages works flawlessly and is much faster than Vercel, still on the generous free tier of 100k requests a day, though it lacks Node built-in modules.

Common questions about Cloudflare Pages

What do customers say about Cloudflare Pages?

Customers praise a generous free tier, very fast static hosting and easy deploys from GitHub, often after leaving Vercel or Netlify. The frustrations are mostly with server-side frameworks, especially Next.js, where runtime limits, missing Node features and build failures sent some back to Vercel.

Is Cloudflare Pages worth it?

Of the 66 reviews with a clear verdict, 77% are positive, 5% mixed and 18% negative. The praise mentioned most is good free plan. The most common complaint is poor support.

What do people like about Cloudflare Pages?

The praise reviewers mention most: good free plan (28 reviews), easy to use (24 reviews) and reliable (12 reviews). For example: Calls Cloudflare Pages honestly incredible, costing nothing for a site with over 100,000 monthly active users.

What are the most common complaints about Cloudflare Pages?

The complaints reviewers mention most: poor support (1 review).

What does the signal score of 79 mean?

It's how well reviewed Cloudflare Pages is, out of 100. Negative and mixed reviews take points off, and so does having only a few reviews: a service needs plenty of them, compared with the most-reviewed services here, to reach the high 80s and 90s. It's worked out from reviews only, needs at least 5 of them, and updates as new ones come in.

What are the specs of Cloudflare Pages?

Category: Static & frontend hosting. Free plan: Yes.

Where do these Cloudflare Pages reviews come from?

104 are quotes from Reddit, each linked to the original. Customer reviews are checked for spam before they appear. Every review, written here or quoted, is read as positive, mixed or negative.

Discover more static

See all static