Handled a small business web app with invoicing, attendance tracking, and analytics for a full month in production without a single issue.
i
A score out of 100. Negative and mixed reviews take points off, and so does having only a few reviews, so a handful of glowing reviews can’t beat a product many people like.
What customers love, and what they don’tWhat customers noticed
Also mentioned: best for developers3
Customer reviews (14)
Showing 7 reviews mentioning easy to use Show all
Recent experimenting left them very pleased overall, and they see the global CDN, tight CI/CD coupling, zero downtime, easy authentication and free deployment environments as big pluses.
Google EasyAuth login works on the front-end route, though passing the ClaimsPrincipal identity and roles to C# backend functions is tricky.
Links easily with GitHub to get a static site online, though bulk-authenticating an entire Azure AD security group without individual invite links is confusing.
A developer uses Azure Static Web Apps for free hosting and likes its GitHub walkthrough with a ready deployment action.
They host their Gatsby-generated personal site on Azure Static Web Apps' free tier, and pointing it at their GitHub repo set up continuous deployment.
Combines static hosting, standard Node.js Azure Functions, and optional authentication while keeping applications portable and avoiding vendor lock-in.
Common questions about Microsoft Azure Static Web Apps
Is Microsoft Azure Static Web Apps worth it?
Of the 7 reviews with a clear verdict, 43% are positive, 0% mixed and 57% negative. The praise mentioned most is easy to use. The most common complaint is outages.
What do people like about Microsoft Azure Static Web Apps?
The praise reviewers mention most: easy to use (7 reviews), good free plan (4 reviews) and reliable (2 reviews). For example: A developer uses Azure Static Web Apps for free hosting and likes its GitHub walkthrough with a ready deployment action.
What are the most common complaints about Microsoft Azure Static Web Apps?
The complaints reviewers mention most: outages (3 reviews), poor support (1 review) and resource limits (1 review). For example: App started throwing 404 errors all morning despite no deployments in over a week and green status pages.
What does the signal score of 53 mean?
It's how well reviewed Microsoft Azure Static Web Apps is, out of 100. Negative and mixed reviews take points off, and so does having only a few reviews: a service needs plenty of them, compared with the most-reviewed services here, to reach the high 80s and 90s. It's worked out from reviews only, needs at least 5 of them, and updates as new ones come in.
What are the specs of Microsoft Azure Static Web Apps?
Category: Static & frontend hosting. Free plan: Yes.
Where do these Microsoft Azure Static Web Apps reviews come from?
14 are quotes from Reddit, each linked to the original. Customer reviews are checked for spam before they appear. Every review, written here or quoted, is read as positive, mixed or negative.